Don't change California Place Park

(Editor's note: This letter was sent originally Su J'n Chon, a program manager with the Seattle Department of Neighborhoods, and copied to this newspaper.)

Dear SuJ'n, 

It was nice to see you at the June 20 Celebration.  What I needed to know and cannot seem to understand is WHEN WHEN WHEN are you, the Department of Neighborhoods, going to listen to the LARGER part of this community and it's desire to maintain it OPEN SPACES? 

When is the Department of Neighborhoods going to get in tune with this neighborhood?  

FACT: Friends and neighbors of North Admiral do not represent the larger part of the North Admiral Community and are certainly not listening to the Admiral residents.  They represent themselves and their pure self interest and a small special interest group that will seemingly make some sort of profit by going against and angering the neighbors. 

How many petition signatures do you want? How many more hours standing on a corner representing the residents who live here do you want?

FACT: At the public meetings the people wanting to maintain our open space far outnumber the park change supporters. 

Now you want to go around the "process" go after the (city transportation department) to approve these "buffer plantings" that the larger part of the community already told you they do not want.  These plantings will take away the open feeling that North Admiral has always had and is trying to maintain.  They become a magnet for litter and an expense we do not need.  

Now a small group wants to fill up the "southern triangle" with a P- Patch after this community fought for almost an entire year to maintain this open space and again you are not listening to the larger part of the community who wants to maintain the OPENNESS of our neighborhood. 

The community uses the "southern triangle" now.  Ask those who use it to run and play ball and tag on, how they will like it filled up with plants.  Do these residents not matter?

One year ago when this nightmare started, I asked the project manager Kellee.Jones@Seattle.gov How do I oppose changes to this park and "southern triangle?"  She instructed me to get a petition and to get the community involved.  I did exactly that and  685 area residents signed a petition for "NO CHANGE"  and the community came out to the public meetings in fierce opposition to these proposed changes. 

I do not believe the opinion has changed as these were well informed neighbors.  So please, open your minds, listen the the larger part of this community that you also represent.  I may not have all our supporters e-mails and be well organized.  But if I get out on that corner with my sign asking for the community to help, they will. 

I do not want to go through this again.  We love North Admiral for the way it is.  That is why so many of us choose to live here.      

Jan Bailey
North Admiral

We encourage our readers to comment. No registration is required. We ask that you keep your comments free of profanity and keep them civil. They are moderated and objectionable comments will be removed.

Comments

California Place Park

As a long-time resident of N. Admiral, I have been very interested in seeing improvements made throughout the neighborhood in the time I have lived here. I was excited to hear about improvements to California Place Park - which I orginally didn't realize was a park and thought it was part of the adjoining church. I have attended most of the meetings on the subject and feel the city and "pro-park" people have been receptive to making proposed changes minimal, out of respect to the "no park" people. Now people want to raise private money to do some planting along the parking strip, being sensitive to the budgetary constraints the city has. Yet, the "no park" people are still against it. Jan believes her group is the majority voice of this neighborhood, but it's not. Many people young, old, children, no children want to see the park enhanced to make it more inviting. While many of these people can not attend the meetings due to family and/or work obligations, their absence at the meetings should in no way indicate they are against changes. Yes, Jan and her group may have the loudest bark, but she's not the top dog in this neighborhood. Rather than building this community up and trying to create more areas where we ALL can enjoy, Jan and her group have no interest in building community, and frankly, that's NOT what this neighborhood is about.