School Board votes to oppose I-1033

The Seattle School Board approved a resolution on Oct. 21 opposing passage of Initiative Measure No. 1033 (I-1033), which will appear on the Nov. 3 ballot.

The board opposes I-1033 because they said it would limit the growth of state, county and city revenue to annual inflation and population growth, not including voter-approved revenue increases.

“If passed, this initiative will have a devastating impact on public schools throughout the state, including Seattle Public Schools,” said School Board President Michael DeBell. “By limiting the growth of the Washington state general fund revenues, it effectively limits the funds available to support K-12 education.”

Approximately 42 percent of state general fund revenues currently support K-12 education. The state’s Office of Financial Management estimates that I-1033 will reduce state revenue by approximately $5.9 billion by 2015.

State funding for Seattle Public Schools was reduced significantly for the 2009-2010 school year, contributing to an historic budget shortfall that the district had to manage.Cost reductions included: staff and teacher reductions in force, changes in schedules and transportation, and difficult capacity management decisions.

“This initiative is on the ballot in a year when the Washington Legislature reduced funding for K-12 public schools in the state by $1.5 billion,” said DeBell. “I-1033 will further erode K-12 funding and prevent the State from making new investments in education — despite passage of education reform earlier this year.”

HB 2261, the basic education reform legislation, was signed into law in 2009. It outlines a nine-year plan for revamping the state’s K-12 education finance system and revises the way the state defines and pays for basic education.

Steve Zemke MajorityRulesBlog wrote 45 weeks 3 days ago

No on I-1033 Right Decision

What is deceptive about the I-1033 ballot title is that it talks about limiting growth, when it is really a budget freeze. The Washington State Attorney General's Office obviously did Tim Eyman a favor with this ballot title.

Adjusting for inflation only allows you to purchase this year's goods next year at their inflated price. And in actuality an additional problem is that Eyman's proposed adjustment is for consumer prices, and that index does not track government service costs like for Medicaid or education.

There is no free lunch. We have already cut $1.5 billion from education this year. Let's guess how people will feel about the few dollars people might get rebated to them on their property taxes when they see the decreased education their children will get.

Colorado passed a similar measure to Eyman's I-1033 and spending for K12 education went from 35th to 49th in the country. Maybe we can be 50th.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <b><a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br><p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image Verification
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Our Stories Around West Seattle

Follow us on Twitter and Facebook!

Receive updates on news and events in the West Seattle neighborhood via Twitter or Facebook!