Welcome To The WestSeattleHerald.com Updated As Warranted

Local News




'Partial' bus wrap eyed

Monday, August 06, 2007

Some buses in the King County Metro fleet may be getting a makeover in the near future. Metro recently submitted a proposal to the King City Council to allow buses partially wrapped with advertisements. This is a reaction to the King City Council's directive that Metro stop selling full-wrap bus advertisement.

"The primary objections were to lack of visibility looking though the windows," said Sharron Shimbo, Metro's project manager. "Some customers also felt that it was dark. The executive asked us to look into other options to accommodate more light and visibility."

The proposal calls for a 15-inch band of unobstructed glass on the windows of all partial-wrap buses. According to Shimbo, this is the first time such a template has been considered in bus advertising. If the ordinance is passed, Metro will work with their advertising provider, Titan Outdoor, to sell partial-wrap advertisements to cover approximately 50 buses.

"We're trying to allow increased coverage so advertisers will pay a premium," said Shimbo. "While it may not be a large part of our operating budget, that revenue can still pay for important services for customers."

In 2007, Metro's net income for one full-wrap 60-foot carriage was $2,922 a month. Last year, the 25 full-wrap buses in Metro's fleet earned a combined revenue of $743,000, which is enough to pay for 30 lit bus shelters.

Although Metro does not have definite figures for the revenue to be gained from partial-wrap buses if the ordinance is passed, Shimbo predicts each partial-wrap bus might earn "one-half to three-quarters the price of a full-wrap."

Some bus riders have complained that the vinyl window covers on full-wrap buses prevent passengers from seeing local vistas and stop-identifying landmarks from within the carriage. Last year, Metro received 122 comments and complaints about full-wrap advertising.

Jim VanderMeer said he felt the partial-wrap proposal is not a sufficient solution to the difficulties associated with full-wrap advertisements.

"This is quite insulting and demeaning to people who ride the bus," said VanderMeer. "In addition to presenting aesthetic and other convenience issues. They're implying that you don't deserve a window to look out of."

The King County Transit Advisory Committee reviewed Metro's proposal and issued a letter of support, calling the plan "a risk-free source of revenue."

"Taxpayers want government to emulate business and find creative ways (including public-private partnerships, which are a focus of the Transit Now initiative) to fund programs," wrote Joan Sells, chairperson of the committee. "The bus-wrap program is administered and paid for by the vendor. Metro does not have to sell or design ads-or even apply them to the buses."

The King County Council will review the proposal and make a decision in the coming months.

Kat Lewin may be reached at katl@robinsonnews.com


Let us know what you think about this story or topic. Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.


PJ Harnish wrote on Aug 9, 2007 4:42 PM:

" I can understand people not liking the wraps that have complete window coverage but this 15" gap idea looks like a good compromise. I do not understand why riders think it is demeaning or how a window the same size as my SUV window to look out of is insulting. The argument does not sound very objective. As a tax payer who pays taxes to fund the transit system, I am disappointed with the handful of riders who are complaining about Metro generating a large sum of revenue with only 25 buses. And that they are not willing to compromise for the sake of more services for bus riders. Metro gets thousands of complaints every year and those complaints do not make the news or have council members thinking about revamping the transit system. There will always be people who do not "like" something. Having said that there are 2 million people in King County and it is amazing that 122 people may cost the county and tax payers this much money; especially when the riders will be able to see out the window through the gap. "

mark hanson wrote on Aug 9, 2007 4:16 PM:

" 122 complaints is a drop in the ocean compared to the revenue our County receives for full wraps. We live in a democracy, so why would 122 complainers get to control this revenue bucket that belongs to the County and its taxpayers? The County has a fiduciary responsibility to the masses, not 122 complainers. That being said, why aren't even more bus wrapped in advertising? "

Kiersten Lovejoy wrote on Aug 9, 2007 1:38 PM:

" Full wrap buses are a responsible and viable way to generate revenue to help subsidize Metro Transit programs. Riders do matter and that is why the partial window coverage plan is the perfect solution. Riders will be able to see out the windows better and Metro Transit will still receive this extra operationg revenue from Titan Outdoor. This is a winning situation for all parties involved. Please note that out of 1300+ Metro buses, full wraps are only allowed on less than 2% of the fleet. This is a small number of buses to generate such impactful revenue. "

(optional)
   
printable version e-mail this story


This Week's Headlines
Stories with Video
WXPort

West Seattle
Traffic Cams
Bridge at I-5 Bridge at 35th
Fauntleroy & Alaska

Sponsored Links