Welcome To The WestSeattleHerald.com Updated As Warranted

Opinion




OpEd

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

College prepares safety plans

By Jill Wakefield

An urgent question at South Seattle Community College is how best to strengthen the safety of our students and staff. We're all too familiar with headline news about tragic events at school campuses across the country.

The safety question has generated a wide range of possible answers at our college. One idea raised is to have our campus security officers carry firearms. The four-year universities in our state have been given that authority by the state Legislature. But the Legislature has not granted the same powers to any of the 34 community and technical colleges across the state. And we're not certain that is the best solution for us. While it is possible to envision some situations where armed campus personnel might be able to resolve a dangerous situation, we've also learned that those tragic events can erupt so suddenly that they are difficult to prevent, with or without guns.

Facing that reality, we have focused our attention on improving emergency response and communication systems at South. Our increased attention began more than a year ago when we decided to implement the standards of the National Incident Management System (NIMS), the national organizational model for responding to emergencies. A number of key staff members have taken training and become "NIMS certified" in order to respond to incidents in a consistent way. We have conducted drills to think through how best to handle situations like an earthquake. We respond to a written scenario and use feedback from observers to make changes for improvement.

This year, our state Legislature passed, and Gov. Chris Gregoire recently signed, a bill that requires campus safety plans for the state's colleges and universities. South already has such a plan and also has implemented a number of other practices called for in the legislation, including enhanced access to counseling services for students and staff.

The new state legislation also emphasizes emergency communications. After investigating solutions and testing some equipment, we have implemented several new ways in which we will notify students and staff about emergency situations. Here are three now in use, plus one we will add by this summer:

- "Campus Alerts" e-mail and cell phone text messages. Students and staff can subscribe to receive messages, which are sent by security officers and other college officials. While there is no cost for email, those who elect to receive text messages will be responsible for any charges from their cell-phone carrier.

- A "pop-up" message on campus computer screens. Our college computer technology team developed a way for an urgent message to be transmitted to student and staff computer screens across campus, and appear on top of whatever is on the screen.

- Speakerphone broadcast. We've also discovered a way to use office telephones equipped with a speakerphone as a kind of public address message system. Our phone system is old by current standards, so it doesn't have the power to send a message to all phones at once. But we worked around that capacity challenge by developing several speakerphone "trees" that reach into buildings across the entire campus. Even if only one "tree" is activated, a message can reach all "corners" of the college.

- External public address system. We have tested and will purchase outdoor speaker units that are capable of delivering a verbal message or a tone/siren warning. This system also will be able to reach people across the campus.

No one likes to "think about the unthinkable," but at South we're working to improve our ability to respond to possible emergencies, and maintain a safe campus for our students and staff.

Dr. Jill Wakefield is president of South Seattle Community College and may be reached via wseditor@robinsonnews.com


Let us know what you think about this story or topic. Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.


Michael wrote on Apr 18, 2008 8:21 AM:

" It is very commendable that you are taking steps to improve communication on your campus in the event of the “unthinkable”. However I have to respectfully disagree with your opinion about your campus being safer with unarmed security guards than campus police officers.

It is true that the presence of campus police may not keep a campus shooting from happening. However, society as a whole expects more from its police than merely keeping them safe from a deranged gunman. Your campus was cited as the third worst place in Seattle for vehicle theft and car prowls in a Seattle PI story last May. Is this not a concern for your staff and students? Wouldn’t having campus police officers on the campus have a significant impact on these crimes? I also understand there is a concern with graffiti, vandalism, drug use and property crimes on community college campuses just like there is off campus. Couldn’t a campus police department take steps to reduce these crimes as well as improve the quality of life for the students and staff?

Back to the “unthinkable” for a moment. Wouldn’t it be far better to have campus police officers on campus if a shooting should take place at South (or any campus for that matter) than to have to wait for the Seattle Police to arrive? Mayor Nickels acknowledges in his March 2007 Executive Summary that the average time for a police response is seven minutes or longer. To put that in perspective it took only ten minutes for Seung-Hui Cho to fire over 174 times during his attack at Virginia Tech (that is an average of one shot every three seconds) and murder 30 people and wound 21 more. Seven minutes may not seem like a long time to wait when you are safely locked away in an office, but to the people in the classrooms where the gunman is firing it is literally a lifetime, and for many will be the last few terror filled moments of their lives. I would think that the campus officers by virtue of their familiarity with the campus, its buildings and the people who work and go to school there are in a much better position to stop the attack sooner with the potential for a minimum loss of life than waiting for the city police to arrive, officers who may have never set foot on your campus on a regular basis before the shooting started and who will be further slowed by their lack of knowledge of the campus and its people. Is that truly the best option in this day and age where campus violence is moving away from the “unthinkable” and becoming the norm? In an area not far from where a King County deputy sheriff was gunned down in cold blood is it truly prudent to rely on unarmed guards to maintain a “safe” campus?

One final thought. What is the benchmark for deciding when the crime situation is serious enough to warrant giving the community colleges the same ability to protect their campuses as the universities have? Will it take a more serious campus shooting than we have already had here in Washington before someone decides to do something proactive for once, instead of waiting till after lives have been lost? Or will we be watching the legislation finally granting the community colleges their own police being signed with the spilled blood of people who might not have died if the community colleges were truly on equal footing with our universities instead of being second class citizens in the higher education system. "

jason wrote on Apr 16, 2008 11:53 AM:

" I love Jill Wakefield!

She is doing all the right things. "

(optional)
   
printable version e-mail this story


This Week's Headlines
Stories with Video
WXPort

West Seattle
Traffic Cams
Bridge at I-5 Bridge at 35th
Fauntleroy & Alaska

Sponsored Links