Michael wrote on Apr 18, 2008 8:21 AM:
" It is very commendable that you are taking steps to improve communication on your campus in the event of the “unthinkable”. However I have to respectfully disagree with your opinion about your campus being safer with unarmed security guards than campus police officers.
It is true that the presence of campus police may not keep a campus shooting from happening. However, society as a whole expects more from its police than merely keeping them safe from a deranged gunman. Your campus was cited as the third worst place in Seattle for vehicle theft and car prowls in a Seattle PI story last May. Is this not a concern for your staff and students? Wouldn’t having campus police officers on the campus have a significant impact on these crimes? I also understand there is a concern with graffiti, vandalism, drug use and property crimes on community college campuses just like there is off campus. Couldn’t a campus police department take steps to reduce these crimes as well as improve the quality of life for the students and staff?
Back to the “unthinkable” for a moment. Wouldn’t it be far better to have campus police officers on campus if a shooting should take place at South (or any campus for that matter) than to have to wait for the Seattle Police to arrive? Mayor Nickels acknowledges in his March 2007 Executive Summary that the average time for a police response is seven minutes or longer. To put that in perspective it took only ten minutes for Seung-Hui Cho to fire over 174 times during his attack at Virginia Tech (that is an average of one shot every three seconds) and murder 30 people and wound 21 more. Seven minutes may not seem like a long time to wait when you are safely locked away in an office, but to the people in the classrooms where the gunman is firing it is literally a lifetime, and for many will be the last few terror filled moments of their lives. I would think that the campus officers by virtue of their familiarity with the campus, its buildings and the people who work and go to school there are in a much better position to stop the attack sooner with the potential for a minimum loss of life than waiting for the city police to arrive, officers who may have never set foot on your campus on a regular basis before the shooting started and who will be further slowed by their lack of knowledge of the campus and its people. Is that truly the best option in this day and age where campus violence is moving away from the “unthinkable” and becoming the norm? In an area not far from where a King County deputy sheriff was gunned down in cold blood is it truly prudent to rely on unarmed guards to maintain a “safe” campus?
One final thought. What is the benchmark for deciding when the crime situation is serious enough to warrant giving the community colleges the same ability to protect their campuses as the universities have? Will it take a more serious campus shooting than we have already had here in Washington before someone decides to do something proactive for once, instead of waiting till after lives have been lost? Or will we be watching the legislation finally granting the community colleges their own police being signed with the spilled blood of people who might not have died if the community colleges were truly on equal footing with our universities instead of being second class citizens in the higher education system. "
jason wrote on Apr 16, 2008 11:53 AM:
" I love Jill Wakefield!
She is doing all the right things. "